<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web02.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 10:31:52 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Two Psychologists Four Beers - Episodes Tagged with “Spreadsheets”</title>
    <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/tags/spreadsheets</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
    <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, beer, academia, science, controversy</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>fourbeerspod@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Life Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 106: We Need to Talk About Fraud Again</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/106</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">c3c96e03-4a59-4525-b904-86a795a6e58d</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/c3c96e03-4a59-4525-b904-86a795a6e58d.mp3" length="49509086" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>106</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>We Need to Talk About Fraud Again</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Yoel and Alexa discuss the first of a series of four Data Colada blog posts documenting evidence of fraud in studies conducted by Harvard Business School Professor Francesca Gino. They consider the implications for co-authors, those who did the investigative work, and the field as a whole.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:08:13</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Harkening back to episode 73, Alexa and Yoel discuss recent evidence of fraud documented in the Data Colada blog post "Clusterfake." The post is the first in a series of four, which will collectively detail evidence of fraud in four papers co-authored by Harvard Business School Professor Francesca Gino. First, the co-hosts dive into the details, with Alexa soberly (in both senses of the word) explaining the revelations of calcChain. They go on to discuss the potential impact of these findings for collaborators, some of whom have begun conducting audits of work co-authored with Gino. In addition, they speculate about ways to reduce fraud that could relieve some of the burden from those who currently do this time-consuming and often thankless work. Finally, they consider what this means for a field still struggling to build a more trustworthy foundation. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>fraud, Harvard, spreadsheets, cheating research, vigilantes, calcChain</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Harkening back to episode 73, Alexa and Yoel discuss recent evidence of fraud documented in the Data Colada blog post &quot;Clusterfake.&quot; The post is the first in a series of four, which will collectively detail evidence of fraud in four papers co-authored by Harvard Business School Professor Francesca Gino. First, the co-hosts dive into the details, with Alexa soberly (in both senses of the word) explaining the revelations of calcChain. They go on to discuss the potential impact of these findings for collaborators, some of whom have begun conducting audits of work co-authored with Gino. In addition, they speculate about ways to reduce fraud that could relieve some of the burden from those who currently do this time-consuming and often thankless work. Finally, they consider what this means for a field still struggling to build a more trustworthy foundation.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Two Psychologists Four Beers on Untappd" rel="nofollow" href="https://untappd.com/user/fourbeerspod">Two Psychologists Four Beers on Untappd</a></li><li><a title="[109] Data Falsificada (Part 1): &quot;Clusterfake&quot; - Data Colada" rel="nofollow" href="https://datacolada.org/109">[109] Data Falsificada (Part 1): "Clusterfake" - Data Colada</a></li><li><a title="Sci-Hub | Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38), 15197–15200 | 10.1073/pnas.1209746109" rel="nofollow" href="https://sci-hub.se/10.1073/pnas.1209746109">Sci-Hub | Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38), 15197–15200 | 10.1073/pnas.1209746109</a></li><li><a title="Two Psychologists Four Beers Episode 73: We Need to Talk About Fraud (with Joe Simmons)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.fourbeers.com/73">Two Psychologists Four Beers Episode 73: We Need to Talk About Fraud (with Joe Simmons)</a></li><li><a title="Juliana Schroeder on Twitter: &quot;I am waiting to learn more about this case. It is extremely concerning. My coauthors and I are auditing our papers with Francesca, and identifying the raw data files. I think (hope) other co-authors are doing likewise. We will announce the results of the audit when they are ready&quot; / Twitter" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/J_R_Schroeder/status/1670146156029169665">Juliana Schroeder on Twitter: "I am waiting to learn more about this case. It is extremely concerning. My coauthors and I are auditing our papers with Francesca, and identifying the raw data files. I think (hope) other co-authors are doing likewise. We will announce the results of the audit when they are ready" / Twitter</a></li><li><a title="Fleetwood Mac - Little Lies (Official Music Video) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCGD9dT12C0">Fleetwood Mac - Little Lies (Official Music Video) - YouTube</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Harkening back to episode 73, Alexa and Yoel discuss recent evidence of fraud documented in the Data Colada blog post &quot;Clusterfake.&quot; The post is the first in a series of four, which will collectively detail evidence of fraud in four papers co-authored by Harvard Business School Professor Francesca Gino. First, the co-hosts dive into the details, with Alexa soberly (in both senses of the word) explaining the revelations of calcChain. They go on to discuss the potential impact of these findings for collaborators, some of whom have begun conducting audits of work co-authored with Gino. In addition, they speculate about ways to reduce fraud that could relieve some of the burden from those who currently do this time-consuming and often thankless work. Finally, they consider what this means for a field still struggling to build a more trustworthy foundation.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Two Psychologists Four Beers on Untappd" rel="nofollow" href="https://untappd.com/user/fourbeerspod">Two Psychologists Four Beers on Untappd</a></li><li><a title="[109] Data Falsificada (Part 1): &quot;Clusterfake&quot; - Data Colada" rel="nofollow" href="https://datacolada.org/109">[109] Data Falsificada (Part 1): "Clusterfake" - Data Colada</a></li><li><a title="Sci-Hub | Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38), 15197–15200 | 10.1073/pnas.1209746109" rel="nofollow" href="https://sci-hub.se/10.1073/pnas.1209746109">Sci-Hub | Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38), 15197–15200 | 10.1073/pnas.1209746109</a></li><li><a title="Two Psychologists Four Beers Episode 73: We Need to Talk About Fraud (with Joe Simmons)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.fourbeers.com/73">Two Psychologists Four Beers Episode 73: We Need to Talk About Fraud (with Joe Simmons)</a></li><li><a title="Juliana Schroeder on Twitter: &quot;I am waiting to learn more about this case. It is extremely concerning. My coauthors and I are auditing our papers with Francesca, and identifying the raw data files. I think (hope) other co-authors are doing likewise. We will announce the results of the audit when they are ready&quot; / Twitter" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/J_R_Schroeder/status/1670146156029169665">Juliana Schroeder on Twitter: "I am waiting to learn more about this case. It is extremely concerning. My coauthors and I are auditing our papers with Francesca, and identifying the raw data files. I think (hope) other co-authors are doing likewise. We will announce the results of the audit when they are ready" / Twitter</a></li><li><a title="Fleetwood Mac - Little Lies (Official Music Video) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCGD9dT12C0">Fleetwood Mac - Little Lies (Official Music Video) - YouTube</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
