<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 10:40:16 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Two Psychologists Four Beers - Episodes Tagged with “Propaganda”</title>
    <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/tags/propaganda</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 05:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
    <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, beer, academia, science, controversy</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>fourbeerspod@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Life Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 105: Patchwork Politics</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/105</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">e753fc22-d902-414c-9102-eecaef9f6d51</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 05:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/e753fc22-d902-414c-9102-eecaef9f6d51.mp3" length="42652301" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>105</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Patchwork Politics</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Alexa and Yoel discuss a recent article that rejects the idea that political beliefs stem from people’s core values. Instead, the authors argue that these beliefs arise primarily from attempts to forge and maintain affiliations.
</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>58:42</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;In heated political debates, people are often accused of being hypocrites, lacking consistent foundational values. Today, Yoel and Alexa discuss a recent paper by David Pinsof, David Sears, and Martie Haselton, that challenges the commonsense notion that political belief systems stem from our core values. Instead, the authors propose that people form alliances with others, and develop political beliefs that serve to maintain those alliances. The cohosts discuss how these alliances might form, the various biases used to defend them, and whether values are truly absent from the process. They also tackle the deeper question of whether the alliance model means that neither side is right or wrong. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>politics, propaganda, rooibos, alliances, rich movie stars</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>In heated political debates, people are often accused of being hypocrites, lacking consistent foundational values. Today, Yoel and Alexa discuss a recent paper by David Pinsof, David Sears, and Martie Haselton, that challenges the commonsense notion that political belief systems stem from our core values. Instead, the authors propose that people form alliances with others, and develop political beliefs that serve to maintain those alliances. The cohosts discuss how these alliances might form, the various biases used to defend them, and whether values are truly absent from the process. They also tackle the deeper question of whether the alliance model means that neither side is right or wrong.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Two Psychologists Four Beers on Untappd" rel="nofollow" href="https://untappd.com/user/fourbeerspod">Two Psychologists Four Beers on Untappd</a></li><li><a title="PsyArXiv Preprints | Strange Bedfellows: The Alliance Theory of Political Belief Systems" rel="nofollow" href="https://psyarxiv.com/scmhe">PsyArXiv Preprints | Strange Bedfellows: The Alliance Theory of Political Belief Systems</a></li><li><a title="R. Ring - &quot;Hug&quot; | Music Video - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lg6lF3OnIA0">R. Ring - "Hug" | Music Video - YouTube</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>In heated political debates, people are often accused of being hypocrites, lacking consistent foundational values. Today, Yoel and Alexa discuss a recent paper by David Pinsof, David Sears, and Martie Haselton, that challenges the commonsense notion that political belief systems stem from our core values. Instead, the authors propose that people form alliances with others, and develop political beliefs that serve to maintain those alliances. The cohosts discuss how these alliances might form, the various biases used to defend them, and whether values are truly absent from the process. They also tackle the deeper question of whether the alliance model means that neither side is right or wrong.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Two Psychologists Four Beers on Untappd" rel="nofollow" href="https://untappd.com/user/fourbeerspod">Two Psychologists Four Beers on Untappd</a></li><li><a title="PsyArXiv Preprints | Strange Bedfellows: The Alliance Theory of Political Belief Systems" rel="nofollow" href="https://psyarxiv.com/scmhe">PsyArXiv Preprints | Strange Bedfellows: The Alliance Theory of Political Belief Systems</a></li><li><a title="R. Ring - &quot;Hug&quot; | Music Video - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lg6lF3OnIA0">R. Ring - "Hug" | Music Video - YouTube</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
