<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:53:53 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Two Psychologists Four Beers - Episodes Tagged with “Physiognomy”</title>
    <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/tags/physiognomy</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
    <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, beer, academia, science, controversy</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>fourbeerspod@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Life Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 93: Facing a Social Media Mob (with Stefan Uddenberg)</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/93</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">e8fe1b5b-cddc-41b1-b117-c70e6a90d3e6</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/e8fe1b5b-cddc-41b1-b117-c70e6a90d3e6.mp3" length="54331601" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>93</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Facing a Social Media Mob (with Stefan Uddenberg)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Yoel and Alexa are joined by Stefan Uddenberg, who sheds new light on the past episode "A Face for Podcasting."  Stefan, an author on the paper "Deep Models of Superficial Face Judgments," gives an insider's take on why the paper became controversial, how the response impacted him, and why he does the work that he does.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:14:55</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>Yoel and Alexa are joined by Stefan Uddenberg, a social perception researcher and author of the paper "Deep Models of Superficial Face Judgments." This paper was the focus of a previous episde - "A Face for Podcasting" - in which the co-hosts discussed the research, and the resulting controversy. Now, Stefan offers a new, insider perspective. He begins by offering a deeper explanation of the work, noting that a large, diverse set of facial images, is essential for studying how people are unfairly judged based on appearance (e.g., their race and gender). He also recounts the outrage on Twitter and somehow finds lessons to be learned from even the harshest and most misinformed attacks. In an unexpected twist, Yoel and Alexa discover Stefan's hidden talent. Special Guest: Stefan Uddenberg.
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>facial perception, Twitter, physiognomy, in the air, accent control</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Yoel and Alexa are joined by Stefan Uddenberg, a social perception researcher and author of the paper &quot;Deep Models of Superficial Face Judgments.&quot; This paper was the focus of a previous episde - &quot;A Face for Podcasting&quot; - in which the co-hosts discussed the research, and the resulting controversy. Now, Stefan offers a new, insider perspective. He begins by offering a deeper explanation of the work, noting that a large, diverse set of facial images, is essential for studying how people are unfairly judged based on appearance (e.g., their race and gender). He also recounts the outrage on Twitter and somehow finds lessons to be learned from even the harshest and most misinformed attacks. In an unexpected twist, Yoel and Alexa discover Stefan&#39;s hidden talent.</p><p>Special Guest: Stefan Uddenberg.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Two Psychologists F. on Untappd" rel="nofollow" href="https://untappd.com/user/fourbeerspod">Two Psychologists F. on Untappd</a></li><li><a title="Stefan Uddenberg" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.stefanuddenberg.com/">Stefan Uddenberg</a></li><li><a title="Deep models of superficial face judgments | PNAS" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2115228119">Deep models of superficial face judgments | PNAS</a></li><li><a title="Reflections on ML models of first impressions | by Alex, Jordan, Josh, Stefan &amp; Tom | Medium" rel="nofollow" href="https://medium.com/@pnas.2115228119/reflections-on-ml-models-of-first-impressions-5bd28d222ff6">Reflections on ML models of first impressions | by Alex, Jordan, Josh, Stefan &amp; Tom | Medium</a></li><li><a title="In the Air - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFEgdCrWXgo">In the Air - YouTube</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Yoel and Alexa are joined by Stefan Uddenberg, a social perception researcher and author of the paper &quot;Deep Models of Superficial Face Judgments.&quot; This paper was the focus of a previous episde - &quot;A Face for Podcasting&quot; - in which the co-hosts discussed the research, and the resulting controversy. Now, Stefan offers a new, insider perspective. He begins by offering a deeper explanation of the work, noting that a large, diverse set of facial images, is essential for studying how people are unfairly judged based on appearance (e.g., their race and gender). He also recounts the outrage on Twitter and somehow finds lessons to be learned from even the harshest and most misinformed attacks. In an unexpected twist, Yoel and Alexa discover Stefan&#39;s hidden talent.</p><p>Special Guest: Stefan Uddenberg.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Two Psychologists F. on Untappd" rel="nofollow" href="https://untappd.com/user/fourbeerspod">Two Psychologists F. on Untappd</a></li><li><a title="Stefan Uddenberg" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.stefanuddenberg.com/">Stefan Uddenberg</a></li><li><a title="Deep models of superficial face judgments | PNAS" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2115228119">Deep models of superficial face judgments | PNAS</a></li><li><a title="Reflections on ML models of first impressions | by Alex, Jordan, Josh, Stefan &amp; Tom | Medium" rel="nofollow" href="https://medium.com/@pnas.2115228119/reflections-on-ml-models-of-first-impressions-5bd28d222ff6">Reflections on ML models of first impressions | by Alex, Jordan, Josh, Stefan &amp; Tom | Medium</a></li><li><a title="In the Air - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFEgdCrWXgo">In the Air - YouTube</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 86: A Face For Podcasting</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/86</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">692f1ae4-1e1a-426a-b3f4-14d7297a0f95</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/692f1ae4-1e1a-426a-b3f4-14d7297a0f95.mp3" length="47183783" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>86</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>A Face For Podcasting</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Yoel and Alexa discuss a study that examines how people infer traits from facial features. They consider various criticisms of the work, and evaluate whether the benefits outweigh the risks.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:05:00</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>Yoel and Alexa discuss a recent study that examines the facial features that people perceive as "smart," "dorky," "trustworthy," or a number of other traits. The study quickly captured a lot of attention, eliciting both fascination and anger. The cohosts turn to Twitter, and to Alexa's undergraduate students, to attempt to gain a deeper understanding of the criticisms and suspicions expressed about the work. In the process, they consider whether glasses make you look smart, and whether babies can be trusted. 
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>face perception, trust, deep fakes, physiognomy, electable babies</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Yoel and Alexa discuss a recent study that examines the facial features that people perceive as &quot;smart,&quot; &quot;dorky,&quot; &quot;trustworthy,&quot; or a number of other traits. The study quickly captured a lot of attention, eliciting both fascination and anger. The cohosts turn to Twitter, and to Alexa&#39;s undergraduate students, to attempt to gain a deeper understanding of the criticisms and suspicions expressed about the work. In the process, they consider whether glasses make you look smart, and whether babies can be trusted.</p><p>Sponsored By:</p><ul><li><a rel="nofollow" href="https://eu.findingfive.com/">FindingFive</a>: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://eu.findingfive.com/">Link and promo code for users in the European Union</a> Promo Code: FF-EU-2P4B</li><li><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.findingfive.com">FindingFive</a>: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.findingfive.com">FindingFive is a non-profit web platform where academic researchers can create and run online behavioral research studies in the cloud.</a> Promo Code: FF-US-2P4B</li></ul><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Two Psychologists F. on Untappd" rel="nofollow" href="https://untappd.com/user/fourbeerspod">Two Psychologists F. on Untappd</a></li><li><a title="Deep models of superficial face judgments | PNAS" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/suppl/10.1073/pnas.2115228119">Deep models of superficial face judgments | PNAS</a></li><li><a title="Abeba Birhane on Twitter: &quot;&quot;trustworthy&quot;, &quot;smart&quot; &amp; &quot;privilege&quot; are not things that can be read off faces. this is nothing but a form of machine aided phsygnomy that will be used for insidious purposes which will end up harming those that don&#39;t fit social and historical stereotypes&quot; / Twitter" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/Abebab/status/1518269338624667648?s=20&amp;t=PIoFYMhXZsGevihiSOUwfw">Abeba Birhane on Twitter: ""trustworthy", "smart" &amp; "privilege" are not things that can be read off faces. this is nothing but a form of machine aided phsygnomy that will be used for insidious purposes which will end up harming those that don't fit social and historical stereotypes" / Twitter</a></li><li><a title="Tim Maughan on Twitter: &quot;fuck you and fuck your digital calliper skull measuring snake oil bullshit&quot; / Twitter" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/timmaughan/status/1518399785576943617">Tim Maughan on Twitter: "fuck you and fuck your digital calliper skull measuring snake oil bullshit" / Twitter</a></li><li><a title="Yoel Inbar on Twitter: &quot;I&#39;d be very interested in the strong argument against this kind of research (ideally including readings). I see a lot of moral outrage in the replies/quote tweets but I would like to know more about why. As an outsider it seems sort of baffling.&quot; / Twitter" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/yorl/status/1518584600527843329?s=20&amp;t=PIoFYMhXZsGevihiSOUwfw">Yoel Inbar on Twitter: "I'd be very interested in the strong argument against this kind of research (ideally including readings). I see a lot of moral outrage in the replies/quote tweets but I would like to know more about why. As an outsider it seems sort of baffling." / Twitter</a></li><li><a title="joseph osmundson (all pronouns) on Twitter: &quot;@yorl There are literally entire libraries on this, Jesus.&quot; / Twitter" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/reluctantlyjoe/status/1518626852788740103">joseph osmundson (all pronouns) on Twitter: "@yorl There are literally entire libraries on this, Jesus." / Twitter</a></li><li><a title="The Data Therapist on Twitter: &quot;I like this question. Baffled by all the outrage around AI ethics? Would like to form your own opinion but not sure how to start thinking about it? Here’s my 3 minute tweetorial / lay of the land: #ethnlp #AIEthics #EthicalAI&quot; / Twitter" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/yuvalmarton/status/1518653224185606145">The Data Therapist on Twitter: "I like this question. Baffled by all the outrage around AI ethics? Would like to form your own opinion but not sure how to start thinking about it? Here’s my 3 minute tweetorial / lay of the land: #ethnlp #AIEthics #EthicalAI" / Twitter</a></li><li><a title="The ethical questions that haunt facial-recognition research" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03187-3">The ethical questions that haunt facial-recognition research</a></li><li><a title="Physiognomy’s New Clothes. by Blaise Agüera y Arcas, Margaret… | by Blaise Aguera y Arcas | Medium" rel="nofollow" href="https://medium.com/@blaisea/physiognomys-new-clothes-f2d4b59fdd6a">Physiognomy’s New Clothes. by Blaise Agüera y Arcas, Margaret… | by Blaise Aguera y Arcas | Medium</a></li><li><a title="Black racial phenotypicality shapes social pain and support judgments" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103119304639">Black racial phenotypicality shapes social pain and support judgments</a></li><li><a title="I&#39;ve Just Seen a Face - The Beatles (Cover) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlF3WBYUcG4">I've Just Seen a Face - The Beatles (Cover) - YouTube</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Yoel and Alexa discuss a recent study that examines the facial features that people perceive as &quot;smart,&quot; &quot;dorky,&quot; &quot;trustworthy,&quot; or a number of other traits. The study quickly captured a lot of attention, eliciting both fascination and anger. The cohosts turn to Twitter, and to Alexa&#39;s undergraduate students, to attempt to gain a deeper understanding of the criticisms and suspicions expressed about the work. In the process, they consider whether glasses make you look smart, and whether babies can be trusted.</p><p>Sponsored By:</p><ul><li><a rel="nofollow" href="https://eu.findingfive.com/">FindingFive</a>: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://eu.findingfive.com/">Link and promo code for users in the European Union</a> Promo Code: FF-EU-2P4B</li><li><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.findingfive.com">FindingFive</a>: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.findingfive.com">FindingFive is a non-profit web platform where academic researchers can create and run online behavioral research studies in the cloud.</a> Promo Code: FF-US-2P4B</li></ul><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Two Psychologists F. on Untappd" rel="nofollow" href="https://untappd.com/user/fourbeerspod">Two Psychologists F. on Untappd</a></li><li><a title="Deep models of superficial face judgments | PNAS" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/suppl/10.1073/pnas.2115228119">Deep models of superficial face judgments | PNAS</a></li><li><a title="Abeba Birhane on Twitter: &quot;&quot;trustworthy&quot;, &quot;smart&quot; &amp; &quot;privilege&quot; are not things that can be read off faces. this is nothing but a form of machine aided phsygnomy that will be used for insidious purposes which will end up harming those that don&#39;t fit social and historical stereotypes&quot; / Twitter" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/Abebab/status/1518269338624667648?s=20&amp;t=PIoFYMhXZsGevihiSOUwfw">Abeba Birhane on Twitter: ""trustworthy", "smart" &amp; "privilege" are not things that can be read off faces. this is nothing but a form of machine aided phsygnomy that will be used for insidious purposes which will end up harming those that don't fit social and historical stereotypes" / Twitter</a></li><li><a title="Tim Maughan on Twitter: &quot;fuck you and fuck your digital calliper skull measuring snake oil bullshit&quot; / Twitter" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/timmaughan/status/1518399785576943617">Tim Maughan on Twitter: "fuck you and fuck your digital calliper skull measuring snake oil bullshit" / Twitter</a></li><li><a title="Yoel Inbar on Twitter: &quot;I&#39;d be very interested in the strong argument against this kind of research (ideally including readings). I see a lot of moral outrage in the replies/quote tweets but I would like to know more about why. As an outsider it seems sort of baffling.&quot; / Twitter" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/yorl/status/1518584600527843329?s=20&amp;t=PIoFYMhXZsGevihiSOUwfw">Yoel Inbar on Twitter: "I'd be very interested in the strong argument against this kind of research (ideally including readings). I see a lot of moral outrage in the replies/quote tweets but I would like to know more about why. As an outsider it seems sort of baffling." / Twitter</a></li><li><a title="joseph osmundson (all pronouns) on Twitter: &quot;@yorl There are literally entire libraries on this, Jesus.&quot; / Twitter" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/reluctantlyjoe/status/1518626852788740103">joseph osmundson (all pronouns) on Twitter: "@yorl There are literally entire libraries on this, Jesus." / Twitter</a></li><li><a title="The Data Therapist on Twitter: &quot;I like this question. Baffled by all the outrage around AI ethics? Would like to form your own opinion but not sure how to start thinking about it? Here’s my 3 minute tweetorial / lay of the land: #ethnlp #AIEthics #EthicalAI&quot; / Twitter" rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/yuvalmarton/status/1518653224185606145">The Data Therapist on Twitter: "I like this question. Baffled by all the outrage around AI ethics? Would like to form your own opinion but not sure how to start thinking about it? Here’s my 3 minute tweetorial / lay of the land: #ethnlp #AIEthics #EthicalAI" / Twitter</a></li><li><a title="The ethical questions that haunt facial-recognition research" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03187-3">The ethical questions that haunt facial-recognition research</a></li><li><a title="Physiognomy’s New Clothes. by Blaise Agüera y Arcas, Margaret… | by Blaise Aguera y Arcas | Medium" rel="nofollow" href="https://medium.com/@blaisea/physiognomys-new-clothes-f2d4b59fdd6a">Physiognomy’s New Clothes. by Blaise Agüera y Arcas, Margaret… | by Blaise Aguera y Arcas | Medium</a></li><li><a title="Black racial phenotypicality shapes social pain and support judgments" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103119304639">Black racial phenotypicality shapes social pain and support judgments</a></li><li><a title="I&#39;ve Just Seen a Face - The Beatles (Cover) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlF3WBYUcG4">I've Just Seen a Face - The Beatles (Cover) - YouTube</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
