<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 09:37:13 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Two Psychologists Four Beers - Episodes Tagged with “Peeping Through Holes”</title>
    <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/tags/peeping%20through%20holes</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
    <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, beer, academia, science, controversy</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>fourbeerspod@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Life Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 84: Check Your Values?</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/84</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">29f4bacb-c86a-411b-aee2-d5745d6e950b</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/29f4bacb-c86a-411b-aee2-d5745d6e950b.mp3" length="49940516" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>84</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Check Your Values?</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Alexa and Yoel debate whether or not science should be value free. They consider whether such a scenario would be possible or desirable, and how well it describes contemporary social psychology</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:08:49</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Alexa and Yoel fight some more, this time over whether or not science should be value free. They consider a position taken by W. E. B. Du Bois, who argued that social change was only possible if scientists focused solely on finding truth. In the process, they consider whether scientists should ever keep findings to themselves, and discuss the merits of leaving the value judgments to the politicians. In the end, they somehow conclude that it is fine that they never justify their alphas. Next time, Alexa promises to find out what's happening on UA frat house lawns. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>scientific values, W. E. B. Du Bois, democracy, light bud light with lime, cheap cheese</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Alexa and Yoel fight some more, this time over whether or not science should be value free. They consider a position taken by W. E. B. Du Bois, who argued that social change was only possible if scientists focused solely on finding truth. In the process, they consider whether scientists should ever keep findings to themselves, and discuss the merits of leaving the value judgments to the politicians. In the end, they somehow conclude that it is fine that they never justify their alphas. Next time, Alexa promises to find out what&#39;s happening on UA frat house lawns.</p><p>Sponsored By:</p><ul><li><a rel="nofollow" href="https://eu.findingfive.com/">FindingFive</a>: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://eu.findingfive.com/">Link and promo code for users in the European Union</a> Promo Code: FF-EU-2P4B</li><li><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.findingfive.com">FindingFive</a>: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.findingfive.com">FindingFive is a non-profit web platform where academic researchers can create and run online behavioral research studies in the cloud.</a> Promo Code: FF-US-2P4B</li></ul><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Two Psychologists F. on Untappd" rel="nofollow" href="https://untappd.com/user/fourbeerspod">Two Psychologists F. on Untappd</a></li><li><a title="Du Bois’ democratic defence of the value free ideal | SpringerLink" rel="nofollow" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-017-1333-z">Du Bois’ democratic defence of the value free ideal | SpringerLink</a></li><li><a title="The SAT Isn’t What’s Unfair - The Atlantic" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/mit-admissions-reinstates-sat-act-tests/629455/">The SAT Isn’t What’s Unfair - The Atlantic</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Alexa and Yoel fight some more, this time over whether or not science should be value free. They consider a position taken by W. E. B. Du Bois, who argued that social change was only possible if scientists focused solely on finding truth. In the process, they consider whether scientists should ever keep findings to themselves, and discuss the merits of leaving the value judgments to the politicians. In the end, they somehow conclude that it is fine that they never justify their alphas. Next time, Alexa promises to find out what&#39;s happening on UA frat house lawns.</p><p>Sponsored By:</p><ul><li><a rel="nofollow" href="https://eu.findingfive.com/">FindingFive</a>: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://eu.findingfive.com/">Link and promo code for users in the European Union</a> Promo Code: FF-EU-2P4B</li><li><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.findingfive.com">FindingFive</a>: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.findingfive.com">FindingFive is a non-profit web platform where academic researchers can create and run online behavioral research studies in the cloud.</a> Promo Code: FF-US-2P4B</li></ul><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Two Psychologists F. on Untappd" rel="nofollow" href="https://untappd.com/user/fourbeerspod">Two Psychologists F. on Untappd</a></li><li><a title="Du Bois’ democratic defence of the value free ideal | SpringerLink" rel="nofollow" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-017-1333-z">Du Bois’ democratic defence of the value free ideal | SpringerLink</a></li><li><a title="The SAT Isn’t What’s Unfair - The Atlantic" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/mit-admissions-reinstates-sat-act-tests/629455/">The SAT Isn’t What’s Unfair - The Atlantic</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
