<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>app03</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:42:59 +0000</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Two Psychologists Four Beers - Episodes Tagged with “Empathy”</title>
    <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/tags/empathy</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 18:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
    <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, beer, academia, science, controversy</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>fourbeerspod@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Life Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 131: What's Wrong With AI (with Molly Crockett)</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/131</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">28f7ec1a-e444-4c91-90ec-f7f279c84863</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 18:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/28f7ec1a-e444-4c91-90ec-f7f279c84863.mp3" length="101720528" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>131</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>What's Wrong With AI (with Molly Crockett)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Cognitive scientist Molly Crockett joins the show to talk about what it's like to be known in the field as an "AI skeptic." We talk about where Molly is actually skeptical, but also what she thinks that label gets wrong. </itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:45:33</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Cognitive scientist Molly Crockett joins the show to talk about what it's like to be known in the field as an "AI skeptic." We talk about where Molly is actually skeptical, but also what she thinks that label gets wrong. Along the way, we cover a bunch of other things too: Molly's research in social neuroscience, computational modeling, and moral psychology; Molly and Mickey's disagreements about empathic AI; and Molly's case for what she's calling "thick empathy." Finally, Molly makes a pitch for non-alcoholic beer, which sadly falls on deaf ears.&lt;br&gt;
 Special Guest: Molly Crockett.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>AI, empathy, neuroscience</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Cognitive scientist Molly Crockett joins the show to talk about what it's like to be known in the field as an "AI skeptic." We talk about where Molly is actually skeptical, but also what she thinks that label gets wrong. Along the way, we cover a bunch of other things too: Molly's research in social neuroscience, computational modeling, and moral psychology; Molly and Mickey's disagreements about empathic AI; and Molly's case for what she's calling "thick empathy." Finally, Molly makes a pitch for non-alcoholic beer, which sadly falls on deaf ears.</p><p>Special Guest: Molly Crockett.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="OSF | The pitfalls of pay-to-play morality" rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/ycdfz_v3">OSF | The pitfalls of pay-to-play morality
</a></li><li><a title="AI Surrogates and illusions of generalizability in cognitive science: Trends in Cognitive Sciences" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/abstract/S1364-6613(25)00251-7">AI Surrogates and illusions of generalizability in cognitive science: Trends in Cognitive Sciences
</a></li><li><a title="Replication for Language Models" rel="nofollow" href="https://arthurspirling.org/documents/BarriePalmerSpirling_TrustMeBro.pdf">Replication for Language Models
</a></li><li><a title="GUIDE-LLM: Reporting checklist for studies with large language models in the behavioral and social sciences" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.llm-checklist.com/">GUIDE-LLM: Reporting checklist for studies with large language models in the behavioral and social sciences
</a></li><li><a title="Do Artifacts Have Politics? on JSTOR" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652?seq=1">Do Artifacts Have Politics? on JSTOR
</a></li><li><a title="CITP Seminar:Janet Vertesi - Where Fairness Fails: How to Confront Material Political Economy of AI - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7juOynisls">CITP Seminar:Janet Vertesi - Where Fairness Fails: How to Confront Material Political Economy of AI - YouTube
</a></li><li><a title="\Reckoning with the Political Economy of AI: Avoiding Decoys in Pursuit of Accountability" rel="nofollow" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16106">\Reckoning with the Political Economy of AI: Avoiding Decoys in Pursuit of Accountability
</a></li><li><a title="UK quietly increases AI emissions forecast 100-fold – POLITICO" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-increases-ai-emissions-forecast/">UK quietly increases AI emissions forecast 100-fold – POLITICO
</a></li><li><a title="The carbon and water footprints of data centers and what this could mean for artificial intelligence: Patterns" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cell.com/patterns/fulltext/S2666-3899(25)00278-8">The carbon and water footprints of data centers and what this could mean for artificial intelligence: Patterns
</a></li><li><a title="Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change: Naomi Oreskes: Bloomsbury Publishing - Bloomsbury" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/merchants-of-doubt-9781608193943/">Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change: Naomi Oreskes: Bloomsbury Publishing - Bloomsbury
</a></li><li><a title="The Risks of Industry Influence in Tech Research" rel="nofollow" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19894">The Risks of Industry Influence in Tech Research
</a></li><li><a title="More Everything Forever by Adam Becker | Hachette Book Group" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/adam-becker/more-everything-forever/9781541619593/?lens=basic-books">More Everything Forever by Adam Becker | Hachette Book Group
</a></li><li><a title="AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/feb/28/ai-empathy-humans">AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian
</a></li><li><a title="Empathy, Thick and Thin by M.J. Crockett" rel="nofollow" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5862422">Empathy, Thick and Thin by M.J. Crockett
</a></li><li><a title="In the Land of the Unreal: Virtual and Other Realities in Los Angeles" rel="nofollow" href="https://dukeupress.edu/in-the-land-of-the-unreal">In the Land of the Unreal: Virtual and Other Realities in Los Angeles
</a></li><li><a title="The Last Human Job | Princeton University Press" rel="nofollow" href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691240817/the-last-human-job">The Last Human Job | Princeton University Press
</a></li><li><a title="Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research | Nature" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07146-0">Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research | Nature
</a></li><li><a title="Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus | Nature" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09922-y">Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus | Nature
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Cognitive scientist Molly Crockett joins the show to talk about what it's like to be known in the field as an "AI skeptic." We talk about where Molly is actually skeptical, but also what she thinks that label gets wrong. Along the way, we cover a bunch of other things too: Molly's research in social neuroscience, computational modeling, and moral psychology; Molly and Mickey's disagreements about empathic AI; and Molly's case for what she's calling "thick empathy." Finally, Molly makes a pitch for non-alcoholic beer, which sadly falls on deaf ears.</p><p>Special Guest: Molly Crockett.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="OSF | The pitfalls of pay-to-play morality" rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/ycdfz_v3">OSF | The pitfalls of pay-to-play morality
</a></li><li><a title="AI Surrogates and illusions of generalizability in cognitive science: Trends in Cognitive Sciences" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/abstract/S1364-6613(25)00251-7">AI Surrogates and illusions of generalizability in cognitive science: Trends in Cognitive Sciences
</a></li><li><a title="Replication for Language Models" rel="nofollow" href="https://arthurspirling.org/documents/BarriePalmerSpirling_TrustMeBro.pdf">Replication for Language Models
</a></li><li><a title="GUIDE-LLM: Reporting checklist for studies with large language models in the behavioral and social sciences" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.llm-checklist.com/">GUIDE-LLM: Reporting checklist for studies with large language models in the behavioral and social sciences
</a></li><li><a title="Do Artifacts Have Politics? on JSTOR" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652?seq=1">Do Artifacts Have Politics? on JSTOR
</a></li><li><a title="CITP Seminar:Janet Vertesi - Where Fairness Fails: How to Confront Material Political Economy of AI - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7juOynisls">CITP Seminar:Janet Vertesi - Where Fairness Fails: How to Confront Material Political Economy of AI - YouTube
</a></li><li><a title="\Reckoning with the Political Economy of AI: Avoiding Decoys in Pursuit of Accountability" rel="nofollow" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16106">\Reckoning with the Political Economy of AI: Avoiding Decoys in Pursuit of Accountability
</a></li><li><a title="UK quietly increases AI emissions forecast 100-fold – POLITICO" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-increases-ai-emissions-forecast/">UK quietly increases AI emissions forecast 100-fold – POLITICO
</a></li><li><a title="The carbon and water footprints of data centers and what this could mean for artificial intelligence: Patterns" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cell.com/patterns/fulltext/S2666-3899(25)00278-8">The carbon and water footprints of data centers and what this could mean for artificial intelligence: Patterns
</a></li><li><a title="Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change: Naomi Oreskes: Bloomsbury Publishing - Bloomsbury" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/merchants-of-doubt-9781608193943/">Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change: Naomi Oreskes: Bloomsbury Publishing - Bloomsbury
</a></li><li><a title="The Risks of Industry Influence in Tech Research" rel="nofollow" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19894">The Risks of Industry Influence in Tech Research
</a></li><li><a title="More Everything Forever by Adam Becker | Hachette Book Group" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/adam-becker/more-everything-forever/9781541619593/?lens=basic-books">More Everything Forever by Adam Becker | Hachette Book Group
</a></li><li><a title="AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/feb/28/ai-empathy-humans">AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian
</a></li><li><a title="Empathy, Thick and Thin by M.J. Crockett" rel="nofollow" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5862422">Empathy, Thick and Thin by M.J. Crockett
</a></li><li><a title="In the Land of the Unreal: Virtual and Other Realities in Los Angeles" rel="nofollow" href="https://dukeupress.edu/in-the-land-of-the-unreal">In the Land of the Unreal: Virtual and Other Realities in Los Angeles
</a></li><li><a title="The Last Human Job | Princeton University Press" rel="nofollow" href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691240817/the-last-human-job">The Last Human Job | Princeton University Press
</a></li><li><a title="Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research | Nature" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07146-0">Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research | Nature
</a></li><li><a title="Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus | Nature" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09922-y">Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus | Nature
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 117: Good News for the Chronics (with Mickey Inzlicht)</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/117</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">97ccc2b0-bf21-4e44-b310-e8d556cf913b</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/97ccc2b0-bf21-4e44-b310-e8d556cf913b.mp3" length="57889288" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>117</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Good News for the Chronics (with Mickey Inzlicht)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>On-again off-again co-host Mickey Inzlicht joins the show to debrief about the recent SPSP conference, dissect a new paper purporting to show working memory deficits in heavy cannabis users, and evaluate some critiques of AI empathy.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:19:52</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;On-again off-again co-host Mickey Inzlicht joins the show to debrief about the recent SPSP (Society for Personality and Social Psychology) conference. We then dissect a new paper purporting to show working memory deficits in heavy cannabis users, including a deep dive into the preregistration. Finally, we discuss a recent Op-Ed in the Guardian that argues that research on AI empathy is fatally flawed. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>SPSP, cannabis, preregistration, AI, empathy</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>On-again off-again co-host Mickey Inzlicht joins the show to debrief about the recent SPSP (Society for Personality and Social Psychology) conference. We then dissect a new paper purporting to show working memory deficits in heavy cannabis users, including a deep dive into the preregistration. Finally, we discuss a recent Op-Ed in the Guardian that argues that research on AI empathy is fatally flawed.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Brain Function Outcomes of Recent and Lifetime Cannabis Use | Child Development | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network" rel="nofollow" href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2829657">Brain Function Outcomes of Recent and Lifetime Cannabis Use | Child Development | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
</a></li><li><a title="OSF Registries | Verbal Memory and Language Processing in Young Adults who Use Cannabis: An Analysis of the Human Connectome Project" rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/bv34e">OSF Registries | Verbal Memory and Language Processing in Young Adults who Use Cannabis: An Analysis of the Human Connectome Project
</a></li><li><a title="AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/feb/28/ai-empathy-humans">AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian
</a></li><li><a title="Tunde Adebimpe - Magnetic (Official Video) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWiGeU1WPW8">Tunde Adebimpe - Magnetic (Official Video) - YouTube
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>On-again off-again co-host Mickey Inzlicht joins the show to debrief about the recent SPSP (Society for Personality and Social Psychology) conference. We then dissect a new paper purporting to show working memory deficits in heavy cannabis users, including a deep dive into the preregistration. Finally, we discuss a recent Op-Ed in the Guardian that argues that research on AI empathy is fatally flawed.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Brain Function Outcomes of Recent and Lifetime Cannabis Use | Child Development | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network" rel="nofollow" href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2829657">Brain Function Outcomes of Recent and Lifetime Cannabis Use | Child Development | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
</a></li><li><a title="OSF Registries | Verbal Memory and Language Processing in Young Adults who Use Cannabis: An Analysis of the Human Connectome Project" rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/bv34e">OSF Registries | Verbal Memory and Language Processing in Young Adults who Use Cannabis: An Analysis of the Human Connectome Project
</a></li><li><a title="AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/feb/28/ai-empathy-humans">AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian
</a></li><li><a title="Tunde Adebimpe - Magnetic (Official Video) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWiGeU1WPW8">Tunde Adebimpe - Magnetic (Official Video) - YouTube
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 8: Confessions of a Science Critic (with James Heathers)</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/8</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">1318124e-d805-4376-8fc4-31a5fbc19460</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/1318124e-d805-4376-8fc4-31a5fbc19460.mp3" length="60138087" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Confessions of a Science Critic (with James Heathers)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Yoel and Mickey welcome Northeastern University research scientist and science critic James Heathers to their show. Yoel, Mickey, and James discuss science reform and the need for robust science criticism.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:02:38</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Yoel and Mickey welcome Northeastern University research scientist and science critic James Heathers to their show. Yoel, Mickey, and James discuss science reform and the need for robust science criticism. Why is it so hard for some (older) scientists to admit their mistakes? Do science critics feel empathy for the scholars they criticize? Is there a danger of science criticism going too far, even over-correcting? What exactly is Yoel drinking this episode? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bonus: James discusses his fascinating research on people who can control their goosebumps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bonus Bonus: Yoel and Mickey submit to James's break-music request.&lt;br&gt;
 Special Guest: James Heathers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>meta-science, science reform, science criticism, data thug, empathy, zealotry, goosebumps</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Yoel and Mickey welcome Northeastern University research scientist and science critic James Heathers to their show. Yoel, Mickey, and James discuss science reform and the need for robust science criticism. Why is it so hard for some (older) scientists to admit their mistakes? Do science critics feel empathy for the scholars they criticize? Is there a danger of science criticism going too far, even over-correcting? What exactly is Yoel drinking this episode? </p>

<p>Bonus: James discusses his fascinating research on people who can control their goosebumps.</p>

<p>Bonus Bonus: Yoel and Mickey submit to James's break-music request.</p><p>Special Guest: James Heathers.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Molson Canadian | Premium Lager" rel="nofollow" href="http://molsoncanadian.ca/en/index">Molson Canadian | Premium Lager
</a></li><li><a title="Big Cranky - Stony Creek BreweryStony Creek Brewery" rel="nofollow" href="http://stonycreekbeer.com/beers/big-cranky">Big Cranky - Stony Creek BreweryStony Creek Brewery
</a></li><li><a title="Retraction Watch – Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process" rel="nofollow" href="https://retractionwatch.com/">Retraction Watch – Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process
</a></li><li><a title="Meet the ‘data thugs’ out to expose shoddy and questionable research | Science | AAAS" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/02/meet-data-thugs-out-expose-shoddy-and-questionable-research">Meet the ‘data thugs’ out to expose shoddy and questionable research | Science | AAAS
</a></li><li><a title="Why We Find And Expose Bad Science – Medium" rel="nofollow" href="https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/why-we-find-and-expose-bad-science-e47387a0e333">Why We Find And Expose Bad Science – Medium
</a> &mdash; Why We Find And Expose Bad&nbsp;Science
(It isn’t because we’re mean.)
</li><li><a title="Here’s How Cornell Scientist Brian Wansink Turned Shoddy Data Into Viral Studies About How We Eat -- BuzzFeed" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/stephaniemlee/brian-wansink-cornell-p-hacking#.ysZVq1wWm">Here’s How Cornell Scientist Brian Wansink Turned Shoddy Data Into Viral Studies About How We Eat -- BuzzFeed
</a> &mdash; Brian Wansink won fame, funding, and influence for his science-backed advice on healthy eating. Now, emails show how the Cornell professor and his colleagues have hacked and massaged low-quality data into headline-friendly studies to “go virally big time.”
</li><li><a title="The voluntary control of piloerection [PeerJ]" rel="nofollow" href="https://peerj.com/articles/5292/">The voluntary control of piloerection [PeerJ]
</a></li><li><a title="The People Who Can Control Their Goose Bumps - The Atlantic" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/03/these-people-can-control-their-goosebumps/555728/">The People Who Can Control Their Goose Bumps - The Atlantic
</a> &mdash; Everyone cannot do it. But Palejko is not alone, either. He is among dozens of people that James Heathers, a postdoctoral researcher at Northeastern University, identified during and after a recent study on the phenomenon. Heathers posted a preprint—which has not yet been peer reviewed—describing 32 people who can control their goose bumps, and he’s been contacted by several others since. Many of them, like Palejko, had thought this ability was perfectly ordinary for most of their lives. Palejko told me his brother can do it, too.
</li><li><a title="Creating goosebumps at will may be more interesting than it sounds | Ars Technica" rel="nofollow" href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/08/creating-goosebumps-at-will-may-be-more-interesting-than-it-sounds/">Creating goosebumps at will may be more interesting than it sounds | Ars Technica
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Yoel and Mickey welcome Northeastern University research scientist and science critic James Heathers to their show. Yoel, Mickey, and James discuss science reform and the need for robust science criticism. Why is it so hard for some (older) scientists to admit their mistakes? Do science critics feel empathy for the scholars they criticize? Is there a danger of science criticism going too far, even over-correcting? What exactly is Yoel drinking this episode? </p>

<p>Bonus: James discusses his fascinating research on people who can control their goosebumps.</p>

<p>Bonus Bonus: Yoel and Mickey submit to James's break-music request.</p><p>Special Guest: James Heathers.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Molson Canadian | Premium Lager" rel="nofollow" href="http://molsoncanadian.ca/en/index">Molson Canadian | Premium Lager
</a></li><li><a title="Big Cranky - Stony Creek BreweryStony Creek Brewery" rel="nofollow" href="http://stonycreekbeer.com/beers/big-cranky">Big Cranky - Stony Creek BreweryStony Creek Brewery
</a></li><li><a title="Retraction Watch – Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process" rel="nofollow" href="https://retractionwatch.com/">Retraction Watch – Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process
</a></li><li><a title="Meet the ‘data thugs’ out to expose shoddy and questionable research | Science | AAAS" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/02/meet-data-thugs-out-expose-shoddy-and-questionable-research">Meet the ‘data thugs’ out to expose shoddy and questionable research | Science | AAAS
</a></li><li><a title="Why We Find And Expose Bad Science – Medium" rel="nofollow" href="https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/why-we-find-and-expose-bad-science-e47387a0e333">Why We Find And Expose Bad Science – Medium
</a> &mdash; Why We Find And Expose Bad&nbsp;Science
(It isn’t because we’re mean.)
</li><li><a title="Here’s How Cornell Scientist Brian Wansink Turned Shoddy Data Into Viral Studies About How We Eat -- BuzzFeed" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/stephaniemlee/brian-wansink-cornell-p-hacking#.ysZVq1wWm">Here’s How Cornell Scientist Brian Wansink Turned Shoddy Data Into Viral Studies About How We Eat -- BuzzFeed
</a> &mdash; Brian Wansink won fame, funding, and influence for his science-backed advice on healthy eating. Now, emails show how the Cornell professor and his colleagues have hacked and massaged low-quality data into headline-friendly studies to “go virally big time.”
</li><li><a title="The voluntary control of piloerection [PeerJ]" rel="nofollow" href="https://peerj.com/articles/5292/">The voluntary control of piloerection [PeerJ]
</a></li><li><a title="The People Who Can Control Their Goose Bumps - The Atlantic" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/03/these-people-can-control-their-goosebumps/555728/">The People Who Can Control Their Goose Bumps - The Atlantic
</a> &mdash; Everyone cannot do it. But Palejko is not alone, either. He is among dozens of people that James Heathers, a postdoctoral researcher at Northeastern University, identified during and after a recent study on the phenomenon. Heathers posted a preprint—which has not yet been peer reviewed—describing 32 people who can control their goose bumps, and he’s been contacted by several others since. Many of them, like Palejko, had thought this ability was perfectly ordinary for most of their lives. Palejko told me his brother can do it, too.
</li><li><a title="Creating goosebumps at will may be more interesting than it sounds | Ars Technica" rel="nofollow" href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/08/creating-goosebumps-at-will-may-be-more-interesting-than-it-sounds/">Creating goosebumps at will may be more interesting than it sounds | Ars Technica
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 5: I Love How You Hurt Me (with Paul Bloom)</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/5</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">e1088be4-0c08-41cf-b182-f6cacd2455f9</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/e1088be4-0c08-41cf-b182-f6cacd2455f9.mp3" length="65568378" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>I Love How You Hurt Me (with Paul Bloom)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Yoel and Mickey welcome Yale psychologist Paul Bloom to the show, their very first guest. In a far ranging conversation, the trio discuss the potential benefits of pain. Why do we sometimes choose to suffer?</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:06:48</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Yoel and Mickey welcome Yale psychologist Paul Bloom to the show, their very first guest. In a far ranging conversation, Yoel, Mickey, and Paul discuss the potential benefits of pain. Why do we sometimes choose to suffer? Are there any benefits (to self or society) to being a painful or disagreeable person? Why do we enjoy and seek out aversive fiction, be that in books, TV, or film? Why do so many of the goals that we set and pursue involve pain and suffering?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bonus: Yoel, Mickey, and Paul each completed a validated measure of agreeableness. Can you guess who came out on “top”? Special Guest: Paul Bloom.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>beers, pain, disagreeableness, Big 5, sex, Very Bad Wizards, fiction, empathy, monkey masturbation</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Yoel and Mickey welcome Yale psychologist Paul Bloom to the show, their very first guest. In a far ranging conversation, Yoel, Mickey, and Paul discuss the potential benefits of pain. Why do we sometimes choose to suffer? Are there any benefits (to self or society) to being a painful or disagreeable person? Why do we enjoy and seek out aversive fiction, be that in books, TV, or film? Why do so many of the goals that we set and pursue involve pain and suffering?</p>

<p>Bonus: Yoel, Mickey, and Paul each completed a validated measure of agreeableness. Can you guess who came out on “top”?</p><p>Special Guest: Paul Bloom.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Disco Soleil | Brasserie Dieu du Ciel!" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/1141/98888/">Disco Soleil | Brasserie Dieu du Ciel!
</a></li><li><a title="Paul Bloom | Brooks and Suzanne Ragen Professor of Psychology at Yale University" rel="nofollow" href="http://campuspress.yale.edu/paulbloom/">Paul Bloom | Brooks and Suzanne Ragen Professor of Psychology at Yale University
</a></li><li><a title="Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion: Paul Bloom: 9780062339331: Amazon.com: Books" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.amazon.com/Against-Empathy-Case-Rational-Compassion/dp/0062339338">Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion: Paul Bloom: 9780062339331: Amazon.com: Books
</a></li><li><a title="Colin DeYoung" rel="nofollow" href="http://deyoung.psych.umn.edu/">Colin DeYoung
</a></li><li><a title="Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five." rel="nofollow" href="http://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2007-15390-012">Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five.
</a></li><li><a title="Do nice guys--and gals--really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. - PubMed - NCBI" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22121889">Do nice guys--and gals--really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. - PubMed - NCBI
</a></li><li><a title="Glad to be sad, and other examples of benign masochism" rel="nofollow" href="http://journal.sjdm.org/12/12502a/jdm12502a.html">Glad to be sad, and other examples of benign masochism
</a></li><li><a title="The Long and Short of It - Paul Bloom" rel="nofollow" href="https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/the-long-and-the-short-of-it/">The Long and Short of It - Paul Bloom
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Yoel and Mickey welcome Yale psychologist Paul Bloom to the show, their very first guest. In a far ranging conversation, Yoel, Mickey, and Paul discuss the potential benefits of pain. Why do we sometimes choose to suffer? Are there any benefits (to self or society) to being a painful or disagreeable person? Why do we enjoy and seek out aversive fiction, be that in books, TV, or film? Why do so many of the goals that we set and pursue involve pain and suffering?</p>

<p>Bonus: Yoel, Mickey, and Paul each completed a validated measure of agreeableness. Can you guess who came out on “top”?</p><p>Special Guest: Paul Bloom.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Disco Soleil | Brasserie Dieu du Ciel!" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/1141/98888/">Disco Soleil | Brasserie Dieu du Ciel!
</a></li><li><a title="Paul Bloom | Brooks and Suzanne Ragen Professor of Psychology at Yale University" rel="nofollow" href="http://campuspress.yale.edu/paulbloom/">Paul Bloom | Brooks and Suzanne Ragen Professor of Psychology at Yale University
</a></li><li><a title="Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion: Paul Bloom: 9780062339331: Amazon.com: Books" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.amazon.com/Against-Empathy-Case-Rational-Compassion/dp/0062339338">Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion: Paul Bloom: 9780062339331: Amazon.com: Books
</a></li><li><a title="Colin DeYoung" rel="nofollow" href="http://deyoung.psych.umn.edu/">Colin DeYoung
</a></li><li><a title="Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five." rel="nofollow" href="http://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2007-15390-012">Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five.
</a></li><li><a title="Do nice guys--and gals--really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. - PubMed - NCBI" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22121889">Do nice guys--and gals--really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. - PubMed - NCBI
</a></li><li><a title="Glad to be sad, and other examples of benign masochism" rel="nofollow" href="http://journal.sjdm.org/12/12502a/jdm12502a.html">Glad to be sad, and other examples of benign masochism
</a></li><li><a title="The Long and Short of It - Paul Bloom" rel="nofollow" href="https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/the-long-and-the-short-of-it/">The Long and Short of It - Paul Bloom
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
