<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>app03</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 21:24:35 +0000</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Two Psychologists Four Beers - Episodes Tagged with “Ai”</title>
    <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/tags/ai</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 18:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
    <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, beer, academia, science, controversy</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>fourbeerspod@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Life Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 131: What's Wrong With AI (with Molly Crockett)</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/131</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">28f7ec1a-e444-4c91-90ec-f7f279c84863</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 18:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/28f7ec1a-e444-4c91-90ec-f7f279c84863.mp3" length="101720528" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>131</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>What's Wrong With AI (with Molly Crockett)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Cognitive scientist Molly Crockett joins the show to talk about what it's like to be known in the field as an "AI skeptic." We talk about where Molly is actually skeptical, but also what she thinks that label gets wrong. </itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:45:33</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Cognitive scientist Molly Crockett joins the show to talk about what it's like to be known in the field as an "AI skeptic." We talk about where Molly is actually skeptical, but also what she thinks that label gets wrong. Along the way, we cover a bunch of other things too: Molly's research in social neuroscience, computational modeling, and moral psychology; Molly and Mickey's disagreements about empathic AI; and Molly's case for what she's calling "thick empathy." Finally, Molly makes a pitch for non-alcoholic beer, which sadly falls on deaf ears.&lt;br&gt;
 Special Guest: Molly Crockett.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>AI, empathy, neuroscience</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Cognitive scientist Molly Crockett joins the show to talk about what it's like to be known in the field as an "AI skeptic." We talk about where Molly is actually skeptical, but also what she thinks that label gets wrong. Along the way, we cover a bunch of other things too: Molly's research in social neuroscience, computational modeling, and moral psychology; Molly and Mickey's disagreements about empathic AI; and Molly's case for what she's calling "thick empathy." Finally, Molly makes a pitch for non-alcoholic beer, which sadly falls on deaf ears.</p><p>Special Guest: Molly Crockett.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="OSF | The pitfalls of pay-to-play morality" rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/ycdfz_v3">OSF | The pitfalls of pay-to-play morality
</a></li><li><a title="AI Surrogates and illusions of generalizability in cognitive science: Trends in Cognitive Sciences" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/abstract/S1364-6613(25)00251-7">AI Surrogates and illusions of generalizability in cognitive science: Trends in Cognitive Sciences
</a></li><li><a title="Replication for Language Models" rel="nofollow" href="https://arthurspirling.org/documents/BarriePalmerSpirling_TrustMeBro.pdf">Replication for Language Models
</a></li><li><a title="GUIDE-LLM: Reporting checklist for studies with large language models in the behavioral and social sciences" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.llm-checklist.com/">GUIDE-LLM: Reporting checklist for studies with large language models in the behavioral and social sciences
</a></li><li><a title="Do Artifacts Have Politics? on JSTOR" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652?seq=1">Do Artifacts Have Politics? on JSTOR
</a></li><li><a title="CITP Seminar:Janet Vertesi - Where Fairness Fails: How to Confront Material Political Economy of AI - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7juOynisls">CITP Seminar:Janet Vertesi - Where Fairness Fails: How to Confront Material Political Economy of AI - YouTube
</a></li><li><a title="\Reckoning with the Political Economy of AI: Avoiding Decoys in Pursuit of Accountability" rel="nofollow" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16106">\Reckoning with the Political Economy of AI: Avoiding Decoys in Pursuit of Accountability
</a></li><li><a title="UK quietly increases AI emissions forecast 100-fold – POLITICO" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-increases-ai-emissions-forecast/">UK quietly increases AI emissions forecast 100-fold – POLITICO
</a></li><li><a title="The carbon and water footprints of data centers and what this could mean for artificial intelligence: Patterns" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cell.com/patterns/fulltext/S2666-3899(25)00278-8">The carbon and water footprints of data centers and what this could mean for artificial intelligence: Patterns
</a></li><li><a title="Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change: Naomi Oreskes: Bloomsbury Publishing - Bloomsbury" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/merchants-of-doubt-9781608193943/">Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change: Naomi Oreskes: Bloomsbury Publishing - Bloomsbury
</a></li><li><a title="The Risks of Industry Influence in Tech Research" rel="nofollow" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19894">The Risks of Industry Influence in Tech Research
</a></li><li><a title="More Everything Forever by Adam Becker | Hachette Book Group" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/adam-becker/more-everything-forever/9781541619593/?lens=basic-books">More Everything Forever by Adam Becker | Hachette Book Group
</a></li><li><a title="AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/feb/28/ai-empathy-humans">AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian
</a></li><li><a title="Empathy, Thick and Thin by M.J. Crockett" rel="nofollow" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5862422">Empathy, Thick and Thin by M.J. Crockett
</a></li><li><a title="In the Land of the Unreal: Virtual and Other Realities in Los Angeles" rel="nofollow" href="https://dukeupress.edu/in-the-land-of-the-unreal">In the Land of the Unreal: Virtual and Other Realities in Los Angeles
</a></li><li><a title="The Last Human Job | Princeton University Press" rel="nofollow" href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691240817/the-last-human-job">The Last Human Job | Princeton University Press
</a></li><li><a title="Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research | Nature" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07146-0">Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research | Nature
</a></li><li><a title="Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus | Nature" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09922-y">Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus | Nature
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Cognitive scientist Molly Crockett joins the show to talk about what it's like to be known in the field as an "AI skeptic." We talk about where Molly is actually skeptical, but also what she thinks that label gets wrong. Along the way, we cover a bunch of other things too: Molly's research in social neuroscience, computational modeling, and moral psychology; Molly and Mickey's disagreements about empathic AI; and Molly's case for what she's calling "thick empathy." Finally, Molly makes a pitch for non-alcoholic beer, which sadly falls on deaf ears.</p><p>Special Guest: Molly Crockett.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="OSF | The pitfalls of pay-to-play morality" rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/ycdfz_v3">OSF | The pitfalls of pay-to-play morality
</a></li><li><a title="AI Surrogates and illusions of generalizability in cognitive science: Trends in Cognitive Sciences" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/abstract/S1364-6613(25)00251-7">AI Surrogates and illusions of generalizability in cognitive science: Trends in Cognitive Sciences
</a></li><li><a title="Replication for Language Models" rel="nofollow" href="https://arthurspirling.org/documents/BarriePalmerSpirling_TrustMeBro.pdf">Replication for Language Models
</a></li><li><a title="GUIDE-LLM: Reporting checklist for studies with large language models in the behavioral and social sciences" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.llm-checklist.com/">GUIDE-LLM: Reporting checklist for studies with large language models in the behavioral and social sciences
</a></li><li><a title="Do Artifacts Have Politics? on JSTOR" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652?seq=1">Do Artifacts Have Politics? on JSTOR
</a></li><li><a title="CITP Seminar:Janet Vertesi - Where Fairness Fails: How to Confront Material Political Economy of AI - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7juOynisls">CITP Seminar:Janet Vertesi - Where Fairness Fails: How to Confront Material Political Economy of AI - YouTube
</a></li><li><a title="\Reckoning with the Political Economy of AI: Avoiding Decoys in Pursuit of Accountability" rel="nofollow" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16106">\Reckoning with the Political Economy of AI: Avoiding Decoys in Pursuit of Accountability
</a></li><li><a title="UK quietly increases AI emissions forecast 100-fold – POLITICO" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-increases-ai-emissions-forecast/">UK quietly increases AI emissions forecast 100-fold – POLITICO
</a></li><li><a title="The carbon and water footprints of data centers and what this could mean for artificial intelligence: Patterns" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.cell.com/patterns/fulltext/S2666-3899(25)00278-8">The carbon and water footprints of data centers and what this could mean for artificial intelligence: Patterns
</a></li><li><a title="Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change: Naomi Oreskes: Bloomsbury Publishing - Bloomsbury" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/merchants-of-doubt-9781608193943/">Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change: Naomi Oreskes: Bloomsbury Publishing - Bloomsbury
</a></li><li><a title="The Risks of Industry Influence in Tech Research" rel="nofollow" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19894">The Risks of Industry Influence in Tech Research
</a></li><li><a title="More Everything Forever by Adam Becker | Hachette Book Group" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/adam-becker/more-everything-forever/9781541619593/?lens=basic-books">More Everything Forever by Adam Becker | Hachette Book Group
</a></li><li><a title="AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/feb/28/ai-empathy-humans">AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian
</a></li><li><a title="Empathy, Thick and Thin by M.J. Crockett" rel="nofollow" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5862422">Empathy, Thick and Thin by M.J. Crockett
</a></li><li><a title="In the Land of the Unreal: Virtual and Other Realities in Los Angeles" rel="nofollow" href="https://dukeupress.edu/in-the-land-of-the-unreal">In the Land of the Unreal: Virtual and Other Realities in Los Angeles
</a></li><li><a title="The Last Human Job | Princeton University Press" rel="nofollow" href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691240817/the-last-human-job">The Last Human Job | Princeton University Press
</a></li><li><a title="Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research | Nature" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07146-0">Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research | Nature
</a></li><li><a title="Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus | Nature" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09922-y">Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus | Nature
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 126: Using AI to Improve Science (with Paul Litvak)</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/126</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">f6b8fb4e-ebbb-4234-ad29-43f3c2a7ebd7</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 11:15:00 -0500</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/f6b8fb4e-ebbb-4234-ad29-43f3c2a7ebd7.mp3" length="71961845" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>126</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Using AI to Improve Science (with Paul Litvak)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Paul Litvak joins the show to talk about how AI tools can help us measure research quality and assess evidence in the scientific literature. His first project is a way to extract test statistics and p-values from papers automatically, with no manual coding needed. We also talk about legendary researcher Robin Dawes (for whom Paul's non-profit is named) and Paul's exit from academia. Plus, Yoel reveals a shameful secret about his use of AI.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:14:33</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Paul Litvak joins the show to talk about how AI tools can help us measure research quality and assess evidence in the scientific literature. His first project is a way to extract test statistics and p-values from papers automatically, with no manual coding needed. We also talk about Paul's non-profit dedicated to improving the reliability of scientific research, the legendary judgment and decision making scholar Robin Dawes (whose entirely algorithmic approach to graduate student selection once went terribly awry), and Paul's exit from academia. Plus, Yoel reveals a shameful secret about his use of AI. Special Guest: Paul Litvak.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>AI, p-curve, Robin Dawes, meta-science</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Paul Litvak joins the show to talk about how AI tools can help us measure research quality and assess evidence in the scientific literature. His first project is a way to extract test statistics and p-values from papers automatically, with no manual coding needed. We also talk about Paul's non-profit dedicated to improving the reliability of scientific research, the legendary judgment and decision making scholar Robin Dawes (whose entirely algorithmic approach to graduate student selection once went terribly awry), and Paul's exit from academia. Plus, Yoel reveals a shameful secret about his use of AI.</p><p>Special Guest: Paul Litvak.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="What If Everyone Knew Which Science to Trust?" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.paullitvak.com/p/what-if-everyone-knew-which-science">What If Everyone Knew Which Science to Trust?
</a></li><li><a title="evidence.guide" rel="nofollow" href="https://evidence.guide/">evidence.guide
</a></li><li><a title="The Robyn Dawes Institute for the Improvement of Science" rel="nofollow" href="https://dawes.institute/">The Robyn Dawes Institute for the Improvement of Science
</a></li><li><a title="Why are so many professors conservative? - by Paul Bloom" rel="nofollow" href="https://smallpotatoes.paulbloom.net/p/why-are-so-many-professors-conservative">Why are so many professors conservative? - by Paul Bloom
</a></li><li><a title="Science is a strong-link problem - by Adam Mastroianni" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.experimental-history.com/p/science-is-a-strong-link-problem">Science is a strong-link problem - by Adam Mastroianni
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Paul Litvak joins the show to talk about how AI tools can help us measure research quality and assess evidence in the scientific literature. His first project is a way to extract test statistics and p-values from papers automatically, with no manual coding needed. We also talk about Paul's non-profit dedicated to improving the reliability of scientific research, the legendary judgment and decision making scholar Robin Dawes (whose entirely algorithmic approach to graduate student selection once went terribly awry), and Paul's exit from academia. Plus, Yoel reveals a shameful secret about his use of AI.</p><p>Special Guest: Paul Litvak.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="What If Everyone Knew Which Science to Trust?" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.paullitvak.com/p/what-if-everyone-knew-which-science">What If Everyone Knew Which Science to Trust?
</a></li><li><a title="evidence.guide" rel="nofollow" href="https://evidence.guide/">evidence.guide
</a></li><li><a title="The Robyn Dawes Institute for the Improvement of Science" rel="nofollow" href="https://dawes.institute/">The Robyn Dawes Institute for the Improvement of Science
</a></li><li><a title="Why are so many professors conservative? - by Paul Bloom" rel="nofollow" href="https://smallpotatoes.paulbloom.net/p/why-are-so-many-professors-conservative">Why are so many professors conservative? - by Paul Bloom
</a></li><li><a title="Science is a strong-link problem - by Adam Mastroianni" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.experimental-history.com/p/science-is-a-strong-link-problem">Science is a strong-link problem - by Adam Mastroianni
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 120: Transparent Replications (with Spencer Greenberg)</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/120</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">febc6b7f-244e-4df0-ac53-b216089deba4</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/febc6b7f-244e-4df0-ac53-b216089deba4.mp3" length="71101428" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>120</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Transparent Replications (with Spencer Greenberg)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Returning guest Spencer Greenberg joins the show to talk replications, what psychologist think of terror management theory (and other controversial topics), and a machine-learning tool he developed to predict correlations between psychological traits and survey questions.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:13:39</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Returning guest Spencer Greenberg joins the show to talk replications, what psychologist think of terror management theory (and other controversial topics), and a machine-learning tool he developed to predict correlations between psychological traits and survey questions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In this episode, we talk about what Spencer has learned by replicating studies from recent publications in psychology, the decline of p-hacking, and what other threats to validity psychologists should be worried about. Special Guest: Spencer Greenberg.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>replication, p-hacking, simplest valid analysis, importance hacking, AI</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Returning guest Spencer Greenberg joins the show to talk replications, what psychologist think of terror management theory (and other controversial topics), and a machine-learning tool he developed to predict correlations between psychological traits and survey questions.</p>

<p>In this episode, we talk about what Spencer has learned by replicating studies from recent publications in psychology, the decline of p-hacking, and what other threats to validity psychologists should be worried about.</p><p>Special Guest: Spencer Greenberg.</p><p>Sponsored By:</p><ul><li><a rel="nofollow" href="https://statisticalhorizons.com">Statistical Horizons</a>: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://statisticalhorizons.com">Use the promo code for 20% off any seminar today!
</a> Promo Code: BEERS</li></ul><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Transparent Replications" rel="nofollow" href="https://replications.clearerthinking.org/">Transparent Replications
</a></li><li><a title="PersonalityMap | Explore 1 million human correlations spanning personality, demographics, behaviors, psychology, and beliefs" rel="nofollow" href="https://personalitymap.io/">PersonalityMap | Explore 1 million human correlations spanning personality, demographics, behaviors, psychology, and beliefs
</a></li><li><a title="AI can outperform humans in predicting correlations between personality items | Communications Psychology" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-025-00205-w">AI can outperform humans in predicting correlations between personality items | Communications Psychology
</a></li><li><a title="What do we know for sure about human psychology? (with Simine Vazire) | Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg — the podcast about ideas that matter" rel="nofollow" href="https://podcast.clearerthinking.org/episode/227/simine-vazire-what-do-we-know-for-sure-about-human-psychology/">What do we know for sure about human psychology? (with Simine Vazire) | Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg — the podcast about ideas that matter
</a></li><li><a title="Career science, open science, and inspired science (with Alexa Tullett) | Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg — the podcast about ideas that matter" rel="nofollow" href="https://podcast.clearerthinking.org/episode/122/alexa-tullett-career-science-open-science-and-inspired-science/">Career science, open science, and inspired science (with Alexa Tullett) | Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg — the podcast about ideas that matter
</a></li><li><a title="Broncho - &quot;Get Gone&quot; (Official Video) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAyCWGn6Ssw">Broncho - "Get Gone" (Official Video) - YouTube
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Returning guest Spencer Greenberg joins the show to talk replications, what psychologist think of terror management theory (and other controversial topics), and a machine-learning tool he developed to predict correlations between psychological traits and survey questions.</p>

<p>In this episode, we talk about what Spencer has learned by replicating studies from recent publications in psychology, the decline of p-hacking, and what other threats to validity psychologists should be worried about.</p><p>Special Guest: Spencer Greenberg.</p><p>Sponsored By:</p><ul><li><a rel="nofollow" href="https://statisticalhorizons.com">Statistical Horizons</a>: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://statisticalhorizons.com">Use the promo code for 20% off any seminar today!
</a> Promo Code: BEERS</li></ul><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Transparent Replications" rel="nofollow" href="https://replications.clearerthinking.org/">Transparent Replications
</a></li><li><a title="PersonalityMap | Explore 1 million human correlations spanning personality, demographics, behaviors, psychology, and beliefs" rel="nofollow" href="https://personalitymap.io/">PersonalityMap | Explore 1 million human correlations spanning personality, demographics, behaviors, psychology, and beliefs
</a></li><li><a title="AI can outperform humans in predicting correlations between personality items | Communications Psychology" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-025-00205-w">AI can outperform humans in predicting correlations between personality items | Communications Psychology
</a></li><li><a title="What do we know for sure about human psychology? (with Simine Vazire) | Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg — the podcast about ideas that matter" rel="nofollow" href="https://podcast.clearerthinking.org/episode/227/simine-vazire-what-do-we-know-for-sure-about-human-psychology/">What do we know for sure about human psychology? (with Simine Vazire) | Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg — the podcast about ideas that matter
</a></li><li><a title="Career science, open science, and inspired science (with Alexa Tullett) | Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg — the podcast about ideas that matter" rel="nofollow" href="https://podcast.clearerthinking.org/episode/122/alexa-tullett-career-science-open-science-and-inspired-science/">Career science, open science, and inspired science (with Alexa Tullett) | Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg — the podcast about ideas that matter
</a></li><li><a title="Broncho - &quot;Get Gone&quot; (Official Video) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAyCWGn6Ssw">Broncho - "Get Gone" (Official Video) - YouTube
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 117: Good News for the Chronics (with Mickey Inzlicht)</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/117</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">97ccc2b0-bf21-4e44-b310-e8d556cf913b</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/97ccc2b0-bf21-4e44-b310-e8d556cf913b.mp3" length="57889288" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>117</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Good News for the Chronics (with Mickey Inzlicht)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>On-again off-again co-host Mickey Inzlicht joins the show to debrief about the recent SPSP conference, dissect a new paper purporting to show working memory deficits in heavy cannabis users, and evaluate some critiques of AI empathy.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:19:52</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;On-again off-again co-host Mickey Inzlicht joins the show to debrief about the recent SPSP (Society for Personality and Social Psychology) conference. We then dissect a new paper purporting to show working memory deficits in heavy cannabis users, including a deep dive into the preregistration. Finally, we discuss a recent Op-Ed in the Guardian that argues that research on AI empathy is fatally flawed. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>SPSP, cannabis, preregistration, AI, empathy</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>On-again off-again co-host Mickey Inzlicht joins the show to debrief about the recent SPSP (Society for Personality and Social Psychology) conference. We then dissect a new paper purporting to show working memory deficits in heavy cannabis users, including a deep dive into the preregistration. Finally, we discuss a recent Op-Ed in the Guardian that argues that research on AI empathy is fatally flawed.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Brain Function Outcomes of Recent and Lifetime Cannabis Use | Child Development | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network" rel="nofollow" href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2829657">Brain Function Outcomes of Recent and Lifetime Cannabis Use | Child Development | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
</a></li><li><a title="OSF Registries | Verbal Memory and Language Processing in Young Adults who Use Cannabis: An Analysis of the Human Connectome Project" rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/bv34e">OSF Registries | Verbal Memory and Language Processing in Young Adults who Use Cannabis: An Analysis of the Human Connectome Project
</a></li><li><a title="AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/feb/28/ai-empathy-humans">AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian
</a></li><li><a title="Tunde Adebimpe - Magnetic (Official Video) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWiGeU1WPW8">Tunde Adebimpe - Magnetic (Official Video) - YouTube
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>On-again off-again co-host Mickey Inzlicht joins the show to debrief about the recent SPSP (Society for Personality and Social Psychology) conference. We then dissect a new paper purporting to show working memory deficits in heavy cannabis users, including a deep dive into the preregistration. Finally, we discuss a recent Op-Ed in the Guardian that argues that research on AI empathy is fatally flawed.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Brain Function Outcomes of Recent and Lifetime Cannabis Use | Child Development | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network" rel="nofollow" href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2829657">Brain Function Outcomes of Recent and Lifetime Cannabis Use | Child Development | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
</a></li><li><a title="OSF Registries | Verbal Memory and Language Processing in Young Adults who Use Cannabis: An Analysis of the Human Connectome Project" rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/bv34e">OSF Registries | Verbal Memory and Language Processing in Young Adults who Use Cannabis: An Analysis of the Human Connectome Project
</a></li><li><a title="AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/feb/28/ai-empathy-humans">AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged | MJ Crockett | The Guardian
</a></li><li><a title="Tunde Adebimpe - Magnetic (Official Video) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWiGeU1WPW8">Tunde Adebimpe - Magnetic (Official Video) - YouTube
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
