<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 20:11:10 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Two Psychologists Four Beers - Episodes Tagged with “Aerial Silks”</title>
    <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/tags/aerial%20silks</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Two psychologists endeavor to drink four beers while discussing news and controversies in science, academia, and beyond.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
    <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, beer, academia, science, controversy</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>fourbeerspod@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Life Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 96: So, What Do You Do?</title>
  <link>https://www.fourbeers.com/96</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">f9c7350e-bd07-4cb1-977f-1e5af49d4c43</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2022 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/f9c7350e-bd07-4cb1-977f-1e5af49d4c43.mp3" length="52400226" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>96</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>So, What Do You Do?</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>In a recent paper, authors Hughes, Srivastava, Leszko, and Condon asked participants rank over 1,000 jobs on their level of "prestige." We discuss this work, its implications, and what it reveals about the human traits we value. </itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:12:14</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/69da8ae3-a19e-41ed-a678-0e145a936a3f/cover.jpg?v=3"/>
  <description>Yoel and Alexa discuss a recent paper, written by Hughes, Srivastava, Leszko, and Condon, that created and validated a new index of "occupational prestige." The index is intended to provide a tool to measure the third component of socioeconomic status, alongside income and education. The cohosts consider how occupational prestige might lead to differential treatment, or even unrealistic expectations ("is anyone in this hotel a doctor?"). Digging deeper, they discuss the paper's exploration of ways that prestige tracks with the physical, critical thinking, and interpersonal demands of a profession. Finally, they realize that as a "former social neuroscientist," Alexa hasn't been getting the respect she deserves. 
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>socioeconomic status, occupational prestige, exclusive societies, hot toddies, aerial silks</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Yoel and Alexa discuss a recent paper, written by Hughes, Srivastava, Leszko, and Condon, that created and validated a new index of &quot;occupational prestige.&quot; The index is intended to provide a tool to measure the third component of socioeconomic status, alongside income and education. The cohosts consider how occupational prestige might lead to differential treatment, or even unrealistic expectations (&quot;is anyone in this hotel a doctor?&quot;). Digging deeper, they discuss the paper&#39;s exploration of ways that prestige tracks with the physical, critical thinking, and interpersonal demands of a profession. Finally, they realize that as a &quot;former social neuroscientist,&quot; Alexa hasn&#39;t been getting the respect she deserves.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Two Psychologists F. on Untappd" rel="nofollow" href="https://untappd.com/user/fourbeerspod">Two Psychologists F. on Untappd</a></li><li><a title="PsyArXiv Preprints | Occupational Prestige: The Status Component of Socioeconomic Status" rel="nofollow" href="https://psyarxiv.com/6qgxv/">PsyArXiv Preprints | Occupational Prestige: The Status Component of Socioeconomic Status</a></li><li><a title="O*NET OnLine" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.onetonline.org/">O*NET OnLine</a></li><li><a title="Hercinia Arts Collective" rel="nofollow" href="https://herciniarts.com/">Hercinia Arts Collective</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Yoel and Alexa discuss a recent paper, written by Hughes, Srivastava, Leszko, and Condon, that created and validated a new index of &quot;occupational prestige.&quot; The index is intended to provide a tool to measure the third component of socioeconomic status, alongside income and education. The cohosts consider how occupational prestige might lead to differential treatment, or even unrealistic expectations (&quot;is anyone in this hotel a doctor?&quot;). Digging deeper, they discuss the paper&#39;s exploration of ways that prestige tracks with the physical, critical thinking, and interpersonal demands of a profession. Finally, they realize that as a &quot;former social neuroscientist,&quot; Alexa hasn&#39;t been getting the respect she deserves.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Two Psychologists F. on Untappd" rel="nofollow" href="https://untappd.com/user/fourbeerspod">Two Psychologists F. on Untappd</a></li><li><a title="PsyArXiv Preprints | Occupational Prestige: The Status Component of Socioeconomic Status" rel="nofollow" href="https://psyarxiv.com/6qgxv/">PsyArXiv Preprints | Occupational Prestige: The Status Component of Socioeconomic Status</a></li><li><a title="O*NET OnLine" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.onetonline.org/">O*NET OnLine</a></li><li><a title="Hercinia Arts Collective" rel="nofollow" href="https://herciniarts.com/">Hercinia Arts Collective</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
